These sight words often appear at a higher frequency in texts at all reading levels.Įither way, what makes reading “slow” is not due to an inability to quickly perceive the words themselves – which is what Bionic Reading claims to fix. ![]() Perhaps it’s a reference to sight words: When someone learns how to read, they normally have many words that they can make sense of via simple recognition, rather than by breaking down the word into individual syllables or sounds. The company website’s assertion that the “brain reads faster than the eye” is also deeply flawed. The Conversation reached out to Bionic Reading for more clarity and to better understand its methodology. Was it reading time? Comprehension? Enjoyment? Casutt doesn’t tell readers what the “positive effect” refers to. A sample size of 12 is extraordinary small, and it is highly unlikely it would make it past an editor’s desk for peer review at a reputable journal. These tests don’t adhere to standard scientific practices. ![]() ![]() He then goes on to write that “the results are unclear.” From there, Casutt says Bionic Reading had a positive effect for most participants, but that others found it “disturbing.” He adds that it wasn’t explicitly tested on people with dyslexia. On the Bionic Reading website, the inventor, a typographer named Renato Casutt, explains that Bionic Reading was tested independently using 12 participants.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |